Table of Contents

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended

Filed by the Registrant [x]☒

Filed by a partyparty other than the Registrant [ ]☐

Check the appropriate box:

[  ]☐     Preliminary Proxy Statement

[  ]☐     Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

[x]☒     Definitive Proxy Statement

[  ]☐     Definitive Additional Materials

[  ]☐     Soliciting Material under § 240.14a-12

FIRST COMMUNITY BANCSHARES,BANKSHARES, INC.

----------------------------------------------

(Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

Not Applicable

-----------------------------------------------------------------

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

[x]☒  No fee required.

[  ]☐ Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.

The filing fee was determined based on________

[  ]☐  Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

[  ]☐  Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

Notice of 20120820 Annual Meeting of StockholdersSHAREHOLDERS

April 24, 2018,28, 2020, at 2:00 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time

Corporate Center

29 College Drive

Bluefield, Virginia 24605

To First Community Bancshares,Bankshares, Inc. Stockholders:Shareholders:

First Community Bancshares,Bankshares, Inc.’s Annual Meeting of StockholdersShareholders will be held at the First Community Bancshares,Bankshares, Inc. Corporate Center located at 29 College Drive, Bluefield, Virginia 24605, at 2:00 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time on Tuesday, April 24, 2018. Following a report of the Corporation’s banking and related business operations, stockholders28, 2020. Shareholders will:

StockholdersShareholders of record at the close of business on March 1, 2018,2, 2020, will be entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting and any adjournments.

First Community Bankshares, Inc. intends to hold the Annual Meeting of Shareholders in person. However, we are monitoring the emerging public health impact of the coronavirus (COVID-19) and are considering the possibility that the Annual Meeting may be held by means of remote communication, including, but not limited to, holding only a virtual meeting.  If we determine it is necessary or appropriate to take any additional steps regarding how we conduct our Annual Meeting, we will announce the decision to do so in advance, and details on how to participate in our Annual Meeting will be announced via press release and the filing of additional proxy materials with the Securities Exchange Commission and will be available on our website at http://www.firstcommunitybank.com. As always, we encourage you to vote your shares prior to the Annual Meeting. 

/s/David D. BrownSarah W. Harmon

David D. BrownSarah W. Harmon

Secretary

IMPORTANT NOTICE

REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS

FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS SHAREHOLDERSTO BE HELD ON

APRIL 24, 2018April 28, 2020

The proxy materials for this Annual Meeting of Stockholders Shareholdersof First Community Bancshares,Bankshares, Inc., consisting of the proxy statement, annual report, and proxy card are available onover the Internet at http://www.firstcommunitybank.com under Investor Relations.

All persons attending the 20120820 Annual Meeting must present photo identification. Please follow the advanceidentification. Advance registration instructions for attending the 2020 Annual Meeting are set forth on the last page 39 of this proxy statement. These requirements must be followed if your shares are held for you by a bank, broker, or other institution.

WHETHER OR NOT YOU ATTEND THE ANNUAL MEETING, YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT TO FIRST COMMUNITY BANCSHARES,BANKSHARES, INC. YOU MAY VOTE BY THE FOLLOWING METHODS:

FIRST COMMUNITY BANCSHARES,BANKSHARES, INC. ENCOURAGES STOCKHOLDERS SHAREHOLDERSTO SUBMIT THEIR PROXIES IN ADVANCE OF THE ANNUAL MEETING. YOU MAY REVOKE YOUR PROXY AT ANY TIME PRIOR TO THE TIME IT IS VOTED.

First Community Bancshares,Bankshares, Inc.

29 College Drive

P. O. Box 989

Bluefield, Virginia 24605-0989

March 16, 2020

Dear Stockholder,Shareholder,

You are invited to attend the 20182020 Annual Meeting of StockholdersShareholders of First Community Bancshares,Bankshares, Inc. (the “Corporation”) to be held on Tuesday, April 24, 2018,28, 2020, at 2:00 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time at the First Community BancsharesBankshares, Inc. Corporate Center located at 29 College Drive, Bluefield, Virginia.

The Annual Meeting will begin with a brief report ofcomments on the Corporation’s operations. This report will be followed by discussion and voting on the matters set forth in the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting and discussion of other business matters properly brought before the meeting.

If you plan to attend the meeting, pleaseplease follow the registration instructions on the last page of this proxy statement. All persons attending the 20182020 Annual Meeting of StockholdersShareholders must present photo identification. Advance registration instructions for attending the 2020 Annual Meeting are set forth on page 39 of this proxy statement. These requirements must be followed if your shares are held for you by a bank, broker, or other institution.

Whether or not you plan to attend, please ensure that your shares are representedrepresented at the meeting by promptly voting and submitting your proxy by telephone, on the Internet, or by completing, signing, dating and returning your proxy card in the enclosed envelope.

Very truly yours,

/s/ William P. Stafford, II

William P. Stafford, II

Chairman of the Board

TABTABLELE OF CONTENTS

PROXY STATEMENT

First Community Bancshares,Bankshares, Inc.

29 College Drive

P. O. Box 989

Bluefield, Virginia 24605

The Board of Directors of First Community Bancshares,Bankshares, Inc. (the “Corporation”“Corporation”) solicits the enclosed proxy for use at the Annual Meeting of StockholdersShareholders of the Corporation (the “Annual Meeting”), which will be held on Tuesday, April 24, 2018,28, 2020, at 2:00 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time at the First Community Bancshares,Bankshares, Inc. Corporate Center, located at 29 College Drive, Bluefield, Virginia, and at any adjournment thereof.

The expenses of solicitation of proxies for the Annual Meeting, including the cost of preparing,preparing, assembling and mailing the notice, proxy statement, proxy card, and return envelopes; the handling and tabulation of proxies received; and charges of brokerage houses and other institutions, nominees or fiduciaries for forwarding such documents to beneficial owners, will be paid by the Corporation. In addition to mailing of proxy materials, solicitation may be made in person, by telephone or by other means by officers, directors or employees of the Corporation.

This proxy statement and the proxies solicitedsolicited hereby are being first sent or delivered to stockholdersshareholders of the Corporation on or about March 15, 2018.16, 2020.

VotVotinging

Shares of common stock (par value $1.00 per share) (“Common Stock”) represented by proxies in the accompanying form, which are properly executed and returned to the Corporation, will be voted at the Annual Meeting in accordance with the stockholder’sshareholder’s instructions contained therein. In the absence of contrary instructions, shares represented by such proxies will be voted FOR the election of the two (2)three (3) directors nominated by the Board of Directors and named in this proxy statement; FOR approval, on a non-binding, advisory basis, of the Corporation’s executive compensation; FOR approval, on a non-binding advisory basis, of a frequency of every three (3) years for future shareholder advisory votes on the Corporation’s executive compensation; and FOR ratification of Dixon Hughes Goodman LLP as the Corporation’s independent registered public accounting firm; and FOR approval of an Agreement and Plan of Reincorporation and Merger pursuant to which the Corporation’s state of incorporation would change from Nevada to Virginia.firm.

Any stockholdershareholder may revoke his or her proxy at any time before it is voted. A proxy may be revoked at any time prior to its exercise byby the filing of written notice of revocation with the Secretary of the Corporation, by delivering to the Corporation a duly executed proxy bearing a later date, or by attending the Annual Meeting and voting in person. If your shares of the Corporation’s Common Stock are held for you in a brokerage, bank, or other institutional account, you must obtain a proxy from that institution, bring it with you to the Annual Meeting and submit it with your ballot in order to be able to vote your shares at the Annual Meeting.

The Board of Directors has fixed March 1, 2018,2, 2020, as the record date for stockholdersshareholders entitled to notice of the Annual Meeting. Shares of Common Stock outstanding on the record date are entitled to be voted at the Annual Meeting, and the holders of record on the record date will have one vote for each share so held in the matters to be voted upon by the stockholders.shareholders. Treasury shares are not voted. As of the close of business on March 1, 2018,2, 2020, the outstanding shares of the Corporation consisted of 16,939,85617,691,191 shares of Common Stock.

The presence in person or by proxy of a majority of the shares of the Common Stock entitled to vote is necessary to constitute a quorum at the Annual Meeting. Abstentions and broker non-votes are counted as present for purposes of determining a quorum. A broker non-vote occurs when a nominee holding shares for a beneficial owner does not vote on a particular proposal because the nominee does not have discretionary voting power for that particular item and has not received instructions from the beneficial owner. Directors are elected by a plurality of the votes cast at a stockholders’shareholders’ meeting with a quorum present. The one (1) person who receives the greatest number of votes of the holders of Common Stock represented in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting for the class of 2021 and the two (2) persons who receive the greatest number of votes of the holders of Common Stock represented in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting for the class of 2023 will be elected directors of the Corporation. If a quorum is present, (i)The advisory approval of the Corporation’s executive compensation program and the ratification of the independent registered public accounting firm requireseach require that the number of votes cast in favor of the proposal exceed the number of votes cast against, and (ii) theagainst. The advisory approval of the Agreement and Planfrequency for future shareholder advisory votes on the Corporation’s executive compensation requires that the shareholder choose a preferred frequency of Reincorporation and Merger requiresone (1) year, two (2) years, or three (3) years, or, alternatively, the affirmative voteshareholder may abstain. The frequency with the highest number of a majority ofvotes cast is deemed as the outstanding shares entitled to vote.non-binding, advisory frequency selected by the shareholders for future advisory votes on executive compensation. Except as stated above regarding the presence of a quorum, abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect on any of the proposals one and two set forth in this proxy statement. Abstentions and broker non-votes will have the effect of a negative vote with respect to proposal three.

If the shares you own are held in “street“street name” (that is, through a brokerage firm, bank, or other nominee) you may vote your shares by following the instructions provided by the nominee. As the record holder of your shares, your nominee is required to vote your shares according to your instructions. In order to vote your shares, you will need to follow the directions provided to you by your nominee, many of which offer the option of voting online or by telephone. Under the current rules of the NASDAQ Stock Market LLC or NASDAQ, if you do not give instructions to your nominee, it will only be able to vote your shares for the ratification of the independent registered public accounting firm and it will not be able to voteprohibited from voting your shares foron the election of directors or approval ofremaining matters brought before the Agreement and Plan of Reincorporation and Merger.meeting.

PROPROPOSALPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

The Board of Directors is currently comprised of eight (8)six (6) directors, including six (6)four (4) non-management directors, currently divided into three (3) classes with staggered terms: the class of 2018,2020, consisting of three (3) directors; the class of 2019,2021, consisting of three (3) directors;one (1) director; and the class of 2020,2022 consisting of two (2) directors. Director I. Norris Kantor, a member ofIn order to divide the class of 2018, recently announced that he will retire effective as of the expiration of his current term at the 2018 Annual Meeting. The Board of Directors, in accordance with the Bylaws of the Corporation, approved a resolution reducing theclasses into an equal number of directors, to seven (7), including five (5) non-management directors. The two (2) remaining directors from the class of 2018 are each nominated for re-election at the 2018 Annual Meeting. Accordingly, two (2) directorsone (1) director will constitutebe elected to the class of 2021 and will serve untila one-year term expiring at the 2021 Annual Meeting, and two (2) directors will be elected to the class of 2023, and will serve a three-year term expiring at the 2023 Annual Meeting. One (1) of the directors from the class of 2020 is being nominated for re-election into the class of 2021 and the remaining two (2) directors from the class of 2020 are being nominated for re-election into the class of 2023.

In the event any nominee is unable or declines to serve as a director at the time of the Annual Meeting, the proxies will be voted for an alternate nominee designated by the present Board of Directors to fill the vacancy. In the event more than two (2) persons are nominated for election as directors, the proxy holders intend to vote all proxies received by them for the nominees listed below, or for any alternates nominated by the Board. All nominees named herein have consented to be named and to serve as directors if elected.

No director or executive officer of the Corporation is closely related to any other director or executive officer of the Corporation by blood, marriage, or adoption.

The table set forth below describes each director and nominee, including his or her age; the applicable director class, which is based upon the year in which his or her term of service expires; and title. A biography describing each director’s and each nominee’s qualifications and business background is set forth below the table. The Corporation does not know of any reason why any nominee would be unable to serve as a director.

Members of the Corporation’sCorporation’s Board of Directors are expected to have the appropriate skills and characteristics necessary to function in the Corporation’s current operating environment and contribute to its future direction and strategies. These include legal, financial, management and other relevant skills. In addition, the Corporation looks to achieve a diversified Board, including members with varying experience, age, perspective, residence, and background.

DIDIRECTORRECTOR NOMINEESNOMINEE FOR THE CLASS OF 2021

W. C. Blankenship, Jr., Former State Farm Insurance Agent, Tazewell,William Davis, Attorney, Richardson & Davis, PLLC, Bluefield, West Virginia.

Mr. BlankenshipDavis was appointed to serve on the Board on August 25, 2015. Mr. Davis graduated from the Virginia Military Institute in 1970, with a Bachelor of Science degree in Civil Engineering and from Washington & Lee University School of Law in 1973, with a Juris Doctor degree. Mr. Davis is a member of Richardson & Davis, PLLC and practices law, primarily in the areas of civil litigation, commercial transactions, trusts and estates, and banking. Mr. Davis has served as a Director of the Corporation since 2015, of the Corporation’s banking subsidiary since 1990, and of a predecessor bank from 1987 to 1990. Mr. Davis has served as a Director for a variety of business and professional organizations in the region, including Bluefield Supply Company, Flat Top Insurance Agency, the Defense Trial Counsel of West Virginia, Inc., and the West Virginia State Bar Board of Governors.

Mr. Davis’ relevant experience qualifying him for service as a director includes: a broad range of business, legal, banking, and regulatory related issues encountered in the practice of law; extensive civic and community service; and thirty-five (35) years of board service in the banking industry.

The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR the nominee set forth above.

DIRECTOR NOMINEES FOR THE CLASS OF 2023

Gary R. Mills, President, First Community Bankshares, Inc. and Chief Executive Officer and President, First Community Bank, Bluefield, Virginia.

Mr. Mills has served as President of the Corporation since August 31, 2013 and currently serves as Chief Executive Officer and President of First Community Bank. Mr. Mills has been employed by the Corporation and/or one of its subsidiaries since 1998. Mr. Mills served as Chief Executive Officer of the Princeton Division of First Community Bank from 1998 until 2005; Senior Vice President of Credit Administration from 2005 to 2006; and most recently as Chief Credit Officer from 2007 until his appointment as Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Mills is a Certified Public Accountant and holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Business Administration with a concentration in Accounting from Concord College (now University).

Mr. Mills’ relevant experience qualifying him for service as a director includes thirty (30) years of experience in the financial services industry; extensive civic and community involvement; and six (6) years of board service for the Corporation’s banking subsidiary.

M. Adam Sarver, Real Estate Developer and Businessman, Princeton, West Virginia.

Mr. Sarver was appointed to serve on the Board on August 25, 2015. Mr. Sarver received his Bachelor of Science degreeDegree in 1972Communication Studies in 2000 from Appalachian State UniversityWest Virginia University. Mr. Sarver has served on the Board of Directors of the Corporation’s banking subsidiary since 2014. He owns and servedmanages several businesses in Southern West Virginia including Main Street Builders, LLC; Eastern Door & Glass, LLC; Longview Properties, LLC; and Clover Leaf Properties, LLC, which are focused on real estate development coupled with residential and commercial construction and development. Mr. Sarver currently serves as a successful insurance agentDirector for State Farm from 1976 until 2013. a variety of businesses, civic and charitable organizations in the region, including the Princeton Salvation Army Advisory Board (past Chairman) and the First United Methodist Church. He was previously a Director for the Princeton – Mercer County Chamber of Commerce.

Mr. Blankenship joinedSarver’s relevant experience qualifying him for service as a director includes a broad range of business, financial, and related experience associated with operating multiple business interests and extensive civic and community service on a variety of boards.

The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR the nominees set forth above.

INCUMBENT DIRECTORS

Samuel L. Elmore, Former Executive Vice President and Chief Credit Officer, First Community Bank, in July 1996 following its acquisition of Citizens Bank of Tazewell, Inc. He was appointed to the Citizens Bank Board of Directors during its formation in 1981 and was instrumental in establishing that bank, eventually serving as Chairman of the Board from 1984 through its acquisition by First Community Bank.Beckley, West Virginia.

Mr. Blankenship’sElmore received a Bachelor of Science degree in Business Management and Marketing in 1970 from the University of Charleston. Prior to joining First Community Bank, Mr. Elmore served as President, Citizens Southern Bank, Beckley, West Virginia; President and Chief Executive Officer, Charleston National Bank, Charleston, West Virginia; Vice President, Key Centurion Bancshares, Huntington, West Virginia; and President and Chief Operations Officer, Beckley National Bank, Beckley, West Virginia. Mr. Elmore currently serves on the Board of First Community Bank and has previously served on the Boards of The United Way of Beckley, Beckley Area Foundation, Raleigh General Hospital, Raleigh County Community Action, Pinecrest Development Corporation, Raleigh County Commission on Aging, and the Virginia’s Automated Clearing House Association.

Mr. Elmore’s relevant experience qualifying him for service as a director includes: more than thirty-eight (38)forty (40) years of expertiseexperience in the community banking industry, including service as an auditor, Chief Operations Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and knowledge in insurance productsChief Credit Officer; prior experience with acquisitions and servicesmergers; and more than thirty-four (34) yearsa variety of bank board service.offices held with increasing management responsibilities during his banking career.

Richard S. Johnson, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, The Wilton Companies, Richmond, Virginia.

Mr. Johnson earned a Bachelor of Science in Business Administration degree from the University of Richmond, Richmond, Virginia in 1973, with concentrations in Economics and Finance, and graduated with a Master of Science degree from Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia in 1977, with a concentration in Real Estate and Urban Land Development.  Mr. Johnson has been the President and Chief Executive Officer of The Wilton Companies, a real estate investment, development, brokerage and management group of companies, since 2002. He assumed the role of Chairman of The Wilton Companies in 2010.  Prior to joining The Wilton Companies, Mr. Johnson served as President of Southern Financial Corp. of Virginia from 1985 to 2002 and Chairman of the Board of Southern Title Insurance Corporation from 1980 to 1985.  Mr. Johnson currently serves as a Director of First Community Bank and The Wilton Companies. Mr. Johnson also serves as the Assistant Treasurer and Director Emeritus of Ducks Unlimited, Inc.; an Emeritus Trustee of the Board of Trustees for the University of Richmond; a Director of the American Civil War Museum, also serving on the Executive Committee and as Chair of the Capital Projects Committee; and as Trustee of the Omicron Delta Kappa Society and Educational Foundation, also serving on the Finance Committee and as Chair of the Investment Committee. He has previously served as a director of the State Fair of Virginia, the Children’s Museum of Richmond, Ducks Unlimited Canada, Landmark Apartment Trust of America, and the City of Richmond Economic Development Authority, where he previously held the seat of Chairman.

Mr. Johnson’s relevant experience qualifying him for service as a director includes background in: long-range planning, various aspects of mortgage underwriting, marketing, and mortgage portfolio servicing; previously chairing the Economic Development Authority of the City of Richmond, Virginia; past service as a director and Finance Committee member of Ducks Unlimited, Inc. and Ducks Unlimited Canada; having served in various state and national offices with Ducks Unlimited, Inc., including Assistant Treasurer and member of the Finance and Audit Subcommittee; and previous service as a director and Audit Committee member of the Apartment Trust of America.

William P. Stafford, II, Chief Executive Officer, First Community Bancshares,Bankshares, Inc., Bluefield, Virginia and Attorney, Brewster, Morhous, Cameron, Caruth, Moore, Kersey & Stafford, PLLC, Bluefield, West Virginia.

Mr. Stafford is a graduate of Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia, and holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Mechanical Engineering. He received hisalso holds a Juris Doctor degree, cum laude, from Washington & Lee University School of Law, Lexington, Virginia. Mr. Stafford has served as Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation since his appointment by the Board in August 2013. Mr. Stafford is a member of Brewster, Morhous, Cameron, Caruth, Moore, Kersey & Stafford, PLLC, and practices law on a limited basis primarily in the areas of commercial transactions, banking, creditor’s rights, and creditor bankruptcy. He currently serves as Chairman of the Board of the Corporation and Chairman of the Board of the Corporation’s banking subsidiary. Mr. Stafford serves as Director and Corporate Secretary of the H. P. and Anne S. Hunnicutt Foundation, Inc., Princeton Machinery Service, Inc., and Melrose Enterprises, Ltd. He is a member of Stafford Farms, LLC, Vermillion Development, LLC, and Walnut Hill, LLC, which include real estate and agricultural holdings. Mr. Stafford is a partner in Legal Realty, A Partnership. Mr. Stafford previously served as a member of the West Virginia Infrastructure and Jobs Development Council and as a council member and Mayor of the City of Princeton, West Virginia. Mr. Stafford has served, and continues to serve, on numerous civic and community service boards and commissions.

Mr. Stafford’sStafford’s relevant experience qualifying him for service as a director includes: a broad range of regulatory, business, legal and banking related issues encountered in the practice of law; extensive state and municipal government service; extensive civic and community service; and service as a member of the Board of Directors of the Corporation since 1994.

YourChanges to Composition of the Board recommends a vote FOR the nominees set forth above.

INCUMBENT DIRECTORSDirectors in 2019

On June 4, 2019, the Board of Directors and the Corporation suffered a tragic loss through the death of long-standing Director W. C. William Davis, Attorney, Richardson & Davis, PLLC, Bluefield, West Virginia.

Blankenship. Mr. DavisBlankenship was the then-current Vice Chairman and lead independent director of the Board and had served the Corporation since 1996 following its acquisition of Citizens Bank of Tazewell, Inc. Mr. Blankenship was appointed to serve on the Board on August 25, 2015. Mr. Davis graduated from the Virginia Military Institute in 1970, with a Bachelor of Science degree in Civil Engineering and from Washington & Lee University School of Law in 1973, with a Juris Doctor degree. Mr. Davis is a member of Richardson & Davis, PLLC and practices law, primarily in the areas of civil litigation, commercial transactions, trusts and estates, and banking. Mr. Davis has served as a Director of the Corporation since 2015, of the Corporation’s banking subsidiary since 1990, and of a predecessor bank from 1987 to 1990. Mr. Davis has served as a Director for a variety of business and professional organizations in the region, including Bluefield Supply Company, Flat Top Insurance Agency, the Defense Trial Counsel of West Virginia, Inc., and the West Virginia State BarCitizens Bank Board of Governors.

Mr. Davis’ relevant experience qualifying him for serviceDirectors during its formation in 1981 and was instrumental in establishing that bank, eventually serving as a director includes: a broad range of business, legal, banking, and regulatory related issues encountered in the practice of law; extensive civic and community service; and thirty-three (33) years of board service in the banking industry.

Samuel L. Elmore, Former Executive Vice President and Chief Credit Officer, First Community Bank, Beckley, West Virginia.

Mr. Elmore received a Bachelor of Science degree in Business Management and Marketing in 1970 from the University of Charleston. Prior to joining First Community Bank, Mr. Elmore served as President, Citizens Southern Bank, Beckley, West Virginia; President and Chief Executive Officer, Charleston National Bank, Charleston, West Virginia; Vice President, Key Centurion Bancshares, Huntington, West Virginia; and President and Chief Operations Officer, Beckley National Bank, Beckley, West Virginia. Mr. Elmore currently serves on the Boards of First Community Bank and the Raleigh County Commission on Aging. Mr. Elmore previously served on the Boards of The United Way of Beckley, Beckley Area Foundation, Raleigh General Hospital, Raleigh County Community Action, Pinecrest Development Corporation, and the Virginia’s Automated Clearing House Association.

Mr. Elmore’s relevant experience qualifying him for service as a director includes: more than forty (40) years of experience in the community banking industry, including service as an auditor, Chief Operations Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and managing the Corporation’s Credit Administration Department; prior experience with acquisitions and mergers; and a variety of offices held with increasing management responsibilities during his banking career.

Richard S. Johnson, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, The Wilton Companies, Richmond, Virginia.

Mr. Johnson earned a Bachelor of Science in Business Administration degree from the University of Richmond, Richmond, Virginia in 1973, with concentrations in Economics and Finance, and graduated with a Master of Science degree from Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia in 1977, with a concentration in Real Estate and Urban Land Development.  Mr. Johnson has been the President and Chief Executive Officer of The Wilton Companies, a real estate investment, development, brokerage and management group of companies, since 2002. He assumed the role of Chairman of The Wilton Companies in 2010.  Prior to joining The Wilton Companies, Mr. Johnson served as President of Southern Financial Corp. of Virginia from 1985 to 2002 and Chairman of the Board of Southern Title Insurance Corporation from 1980 to 1985.  Mr. Johnson currently serves as a Director of First Community Bank and The Wilton Companies. Mr. Johnson also serves as the Assistant Treasurer and Director Emeritus of Ducks Unlimited, Inc. and is an Emeritus Trustee of the Board of Trustees for the University of Richmond. He has previously served as a director of the State Fair of Virginia, the Children’s Museum of Richmond, Ducks Unlimited Canada, Landmark Apartment Trust of America, and the City of Richmond Economic Development Authority, where he previously held the seat of Chairman.

Mr. Johnson’s relevant experience qualifying him for service as a director includes background in: long-range planning, various aspects of mortgage underwriting, marketing, and mortgage portfolio servicing; previously chairing the Economic Development Authority of the City of Richmond, Virginia; past service as a director and Finance Committee member of Ducks Unlimited, Inc. and Ducks Unlimited Canada; having served in various state and national offices with Ducks Unlimited, Inc., including Assistant Treasurer and member of the Finance and Audit Subcommittee; and previous service as a director and Audit Committee member of the Apartment Trust of America.

I. Norris Kantor, Of Counsel, Katz, Kantor, Stonestreet & Buckner, PLLC, Princeton and Bluefield, West Virginia.

Mr. Kantor received a Bachelor of Arts degree in 1953 from the Virginia Military Institute and received a Juris Doctor degree in 1956 from the College of Law at West Virginia University. Mr. Kantor has practiced law for more than fifty-two (52) years and is currently Of Counsel with the law firm of Katz, Kantor, Stonestreet & Buckner, PLLC. He served as a Judge Advocate USAF from 1956 to 1958. Mr. Kantor is a former President and Director of Mercer Realty Inc., a real estate development company, and current President and Director of Gomolco, Inc., a real estate investment company. Mr. Kantor currently serves in the following leadership capacities: Board member of the Bluefield State College Board of Governors, New River Parkway Authority, and the Bluefield Development Authority; and Board member and Secretary of Bluefield State College Research and Development Corp. Mr. Kantor is also a former member and Chair of the West Virginia Ethics Commission and former Board member of the Bluefield State College Foundation and New River Community College Board of Governors.

Mr. Kantor’s relevant experience qualifying him for service as a director includes: a wide range of legal and business experience gained during his more than fifty-two (52) years as a practicing attorney; his legal work dealing with the issuance and refunding of numerous utility bonds; his ability to understand complex business, legal and financial topics; and twenty-eight (28) years of service as a member of the board of directors of financial service organizations.

On February 27, 2018, Director Kantor announced his retirement which will be effective upon the expiration of his current term at the 2018 Annual Meeting. Director Kantor has devoted nearly thirty (30) years of service to the Corporation.

Gary R. Mills, President, First Community Bancshares, Inc. and Chief Executive Officer and President, First Community Bank, Bluefield, Virginia.

Mr. Mills has served as President of the Corporation since August 31, 2013 and currently serves as Chief Executive Officer and President of1984 through its acquisition by First Community Bank. Mr. Mills has been employed by the Corporation and/or one of its subsidiaries since 1998. Mr. Mills served as Chief Executive Officer of the Princeton Division of First Community Bank from 1998 until 2005; Senior Vice President of Credit Administration from 2005 to 2006; and most recently as Chief Credit Officer from 2007 until his appointment as Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Mills is a Certified Public Accountant and holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Business Administration with a concentration in Accounting from Concord University.

Mr. Mills’ relevant experience qualifying him for service as a director includes twenty-eight (28) years of experience in the financial services industry; extensive civic and community involvement; and four (4) years of board service for the Corporation’s banking subsidiary.

M. Adam Sarver, Real Estate Developer and Businessman, Princeton, West Virginia.

Mr. Sarver was appointed to serve on the Board on August 25, 2015. Mr. Sarver received his Bachelor of Science Degree in Communication Studies in 2000 from West Virginia University. Mr. Sarver has served on theThe Board of Directors, at the recommendation of the Corporation’s banking subsidiary since 2014. He ownsGovernance and manages several businesses in Southern West Virginia including Main Street Builders, LLC; Eastern Door & Glass, LLC; Longview Properties, LLC; and Clover Leaf Properties, LLC, which are focused on real estate development coupled with residential and commercial construction and development. Mr. Sarver currently serves as a Director for a variety of businesses, civic and charitable organizations in the region, including the Princeton Salvation Army Advisory Board (past Chairman) and the First United Methodist Church. He was previously a Director for the Princeton – Mercer County Chamber of Commerce.

Mr. Sarver’s relevant experience qualifying him for service asNominating Committee (the “GNC”), elected not to appoint a director includes: a broad range of business, financial, and related experience associated with operating multiple business interests and extensive civic and community service on a variety of boards.to fill Mr. Blankenship’s unexpired term.

DirecDirectortor Qualifications and Experience

The Governance and Nominating CommiteeCommittee (the “GNC”) is committed to presenting for shareholder consideration a slate of nominees that,who, taken together with current Directors, have the experience, qualifications, attributes, and skills appropriate for functioning effectively as a board and as liaisons to the customers and communities the Corporation serves. The GNC regularly reviews the composition of the Board of Directors in light of the Corporation’s evolving needs, its assessment of the Board’s performance, and the input of shareholders. TheIn considering whether to recommend any candidate for inclusion in the Board’s slate of recommended director nominees, including candidates recommended by shareholders, the GNC looks for certain characteristics in all nominees,considers a number of criteria, including but not limited to, the candidate’s integrity, business acumen, age, experience, education, involvement in the communities served by the Corporation, relationships and familiarity with the Corporation’s customers, commitment to the Corporation, diligence, geographic representation, conflicts of interest, strong professional reputation and record of achievement, constructive and collegial personal attributes, significant investment in or experience with the Corporation, and the ability and commitment to devote sufficient time and energy to Board service. In addition,service, and the ability to act in the interests of all shareholders, rather than focusing on representation of a particular group, issue or interest. Additionally, the GNC seeks to include onmust ensure that the composition of the Board a complementary mix of individuals with diverse backgrounds and skills reflecting the broad set of challenges that the Board confronts. Examplesits committees satisfies SEC, NASDAQ, and banking regulatory standards, including those related to director independence. Further examples of individual qualifications and experience considered areby the GNC include the candidate’s professional standing in theirher or his chosen field and in the communities served by the Corporation, expertise in the financial services industry, civic and community involvement in the communities served by the Corporation, leadership skills, and intelligence. The GNC also considersstrives to accomplish broad geographic representation offrom the Board from within thecommunities and markets the Corporation serves and seeks candidates who can help ensure the Board has membersremains knowledgeable and intimately involved in the banking affairs of those customers and communities. The GNC also seeks candidates with a representative mix of skills in finance, technology, marketing, community and business affairs, human resources, and governance.

Diversity of Director Nominees

As stated above, in considering whetherThe Corporation does not have a separate written policy regarding how diversity is to recommend any candidate for inclusion in the Board’s slate of recommended director nominees, including candidates recommended by stockholders, the GNC considers a number of criteria, including, without limitation, the candidate’s integrity, business acumen, age, experience, commitment, diligence, geographic representation, conflicts of interest, and ability to act in the interests of all stockholders. The GNC believes diversity should be considered in the director identificationnomination process; however, the GNC seeks to ensure that there is diversity of thought among directors. Having diversity of thought results in more thorough analysis of each issue and nomination process.better decisions, which in the long-term results in greater shareholder value. The GNC seeks nominees with a broadbelieves that diversity of thought stems from many factors including professional experience, professions, skills,life experience, socio-economic background, gender, race, religion, skill set, and geographic representation, and backgrounds.representation. The Committee does not assign specific weights to particular criteria,factors, and no particular criterionfactor is necessarily applicable to all prospective nominees. The Corporation believes that the backgrounds and qualifications of the directors, considered as a group, should provide a significant composite mix of experience, knowledge, and abilities that will allow the Board to fulfill its responsibilities. The diversity of the Board is evaluated on a continuing basis by assessing whether varying viewpoints are routinely presented, evaluating the individual performance and contributions of each Director, and ensuring that varying perspectives are presented on key issues.

RecommRecommendationsendations for Director Candidates

The GNC willGNC’s practice is to consider all stockholdershareholder recommendations for director candidates which are received prior to February 15^th each year. Any such recommendations should be sent to the GNC, c/o Secretary of First Community Bancshares,Bankshares, Inc., P. O. Box 989, Bluefield, Virginia 24605-0989. The Corporation believes that directors should possess the highest personal and professional ethics, integrity and values, and be committed to representing the long-term interests of the stockholders.shareholders. The Committee also considers candidates recommended by current directors, officers, employees,, and others. The Committee evaluates all nominees for director in the same manner and typically bases its initial review on any written materials submitted with respect to the candidate.

NONON-DIRECTORN-DIRECTOR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

Named executiveexecutive officers who are not directors of the Corporation, including their title, age, and year they became an officer of the Corporation, are set forth in the chart below, which is followed by a brief biography describing each named executive officer’s business experience.

Jason R. Belcher, Chief Operating Officer of the Corporation and Senior Vice President and Chief Risk Operating Officer and Secretary of First Community Bank.

Mr. Belcher has served as Chief Risk Officeran officer of First Community Bank since March 2, 2015, having previously served as Chief Risk Officer and Chief Administrative Officer. Mr. Blecher assumed the role of Chief Operating Officer of the Corporation on January 1, 2020 pursuant to the retirement of E. Stephen Lilly. He has been employed by the Corporation and/or one of its subsidiariesCorporation’s banking subsidiary since 2005. Immediately prior to his current position, Mr. Belcher served First Community Bank as a2005, in various roles including Market President, and has also previously served as Finance and Tax Director, as well asand Treasurer. Mr. Belcher, a Certified Public Accountant, earned his Bachelor of Science Degree in Business Administration from West Virginia University in 1999 and a Master of Accounting and Information Systems Degree from Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in 2006.

David D. Brown, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the Corporation and Chief Financial Officer of First Community Bank.

Mr. Brown has been Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation and First Community Bank since May 2006, and has been employed by the Corporation and/or one of its subsidiaries since 2005. Prior to joining the Corporation, Mr. Brown served in various positions including Corporate Auditor of United Bankshares, Inc. from 1999 to 2005. From 1997 to 1999, Mr. Brown practiced in the field of public accounting, concentrating his work on tax, accounting, and auditing across a variety of industries. Mr. Brown is a Certified Public Accountant and holds Master of Public Accountancy and Bachelor of Science degrees from West Virginia University.

E. Stephen LillyLilly, former Chief Operating Officer of the Corporation and Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of First Community Bank.

Mr. Lilly has beenserved as the Chief Operating Officer of the Corporation and First Community Bank sincefrom June 2000.2000 through his retirement on January 31, 2020. Mr. Lilly hashad been employed by the Corporation and/or one of its subsidiaries since 1997. Mr. Lilly hashad also served in a variety of banking positions and capacities with the Corporation and other banking organizations where he supervised and managed a number of operational elements, implemented new technologies, and successfully migrated and consolidated bank operations and data. Mr. Lilly also has significant experience in process engineering and customer service management. Mr. Lilly graduated, cum laude, with a Bachelor of Science degree in Economics from Western Carolina University and has completed American Bankers Association School of Compliance, Graduate School of Compliance, and Stonier Graduate School of Banking. He is also a graduate of Mellon Cash Management University.

CORCORPORATEPORATE GOVERNANCE

CorpCorporateorate Governance Guidelines

The Board regularly reviews corporate governance developments and considers modifications to clarify and augment the Board’sBoard’s processes, including those relating to risk oversight.

The Board’s Role in Risk Oversight. The Board of Directors believes that each member has a responsibility to monitor and manage risks faced by the Corporation. At a minimum, this requires members of the Board of Directors to be actively engaged in Board discussions, review materials provided to them, and know when it is appropriate to request further information from management and/or engage the assistance of outside advisors. Furthermore, because the banking industry is highly regulated, certain risks to the Corporation are monitored by the Board of Directors through its review of the Corporation’s compliance with regulations set forth by its regulatory authorities, including recommendations contained in regulatory examinations.

Because the Corporation believes risk oversight is the responsibility of each member of the Board of Directors, it does not concentrate the Board’s responsibility for risk oversight in a single committee. Instead, each committee concentrates on specific risks for which it possesses expertise, and each committee regularly reports to the Board of Directors on its findings. For example, the Audit, Compliance, and Enterprise Risk (the “ACER”) Committee regularly monitors the Corporation’s exposure to certain reputational risks by establishing and evaluating the effectiveness of its programs to report and monitor fraud and by monitoring the Corporation’s internal controls over financial reporting, while the Asset/Liability Management Committee of the Corporation’s banking subsidiary monitors liquidity and interest rate risk,risk; the Information Systems Steering Committee of the Corporation’s banking subsidiary monitors information technology and operations risk; and the Corporation’s Compensation and Retirement Committee (the “CRC”) monitors risks associated with the design and administration of Board and employee compensation.

The ChiefChief Executive Officer, President, other named executive officers, and certain other key officers and executives of subsidiaries (collectively, the “Senior Management Team”) assess and manage the Corporation’s risk exposure. Theexposure, under the supervision of the Board and its committees providecommittees. In addition to the named executive officers, the Senior Management Team consists of the following officers:

Milton Campbell, Regional President of the Southern Region of First Community Bank.

Mr. Campbell has been employed by the Corporation’s banking subsidiary since 1998 and has served in his current role since 2009. Mr. Campbell joined First Community following the acquisition of Blue Ridge Bank, where he had been employed from 1989, to 1996. He has over 37 years of experience in the banking industry. As Regional President of the Southern Region, Mr. Campbell provides oversight to all functions of the branch network in connectionSouthwestern Virginia, Western North Carolina, and Eastern Tennessee. Mr. Campbell is also the executive responsible for oversight of the bank’s credit card portfolio and treasury services division. Mr. Campbell obtained a Business Administration degree from Elon College (now University) in 1983 and is a graduate of the North Carolina School of Banking.

Amy S. Hall, Senior Vice President and Director of Branch Administration of First Community Bank.

Ms. Hall has been employed by the Corporation’s banking subsidiary, or a predecessor bank, since 1993 and has served in her current role since 2012. As Director of Branch Administration, Ms. Hall is responsible for ensuring that all market staff are properly trained, developing operational procedural manuals and providing general support to the market network. In addition, Ms. Hall is responsible for the oversight of the marking department and the Client Care Center. Ms. Hall obtained her Associate Degree in Business Administration from Wilkes Community College in 1989.

Sarah W. Harmon, Secretary of the Corporation and Senior Vice President, General Counsel, and Secretary of First Community Bank.

Ms. Harmon has been employed by the Corporation’s banking subsidiary since 2013 and has served in her current role since 2018. In addition to her traditional General Counsel duties, Ms. Harmon performs many of the functions previously associated with those efforts.the Chief Risk Officer role, including oversight of the following departments: legal, compliance, enterprise risk management, Bank Secrecy Act, and human resources. Ms. Harmon earned her Bachelor of Arts Degree in the Interdisciplinary Studies of Behavioral Science and Business from Concord College (now University) in 2002, graduating summa cum laude; her Juris Doctorate from Washington and Lee School of Law in 2006 graduating cum laude, and her Master of Business Administration Degree from West Virginia University in 2017.

Samuel G. Hill, Senior Vice President and Senior Trust Officer of First Community Bank.

Mr. Hill has been employed by the Corporation’s banking subsidiary since 2006 and has served in his current role since 2010. In addition to overseeing the bank’s trust department, Mr. Hill serves as the President of the bank’s wealth management subsidiary, First Community Wealth Management, and insurance subsidiary, First Community Insurance Services, and directly provides financial advising services to wealth management clients. Mr. Hill obtained his Bachelor of Science Degree in Business Administration with a concentration in Accounting from Concord College (now University) in 1999 and holds a Master of Business Administration Degree from West Virginia University obtained in 1999. Mr. Hill is a certified public accountant, is a graduate of Cannon Trust School, and holds FINRA Series 7 and Series 63 securities licenses.

William C. Hopkins, Regional President of the Northern Region of First Community Bank.

Mr. Hopkins has been employed by the Corporation’s banking subsidiary since 1996 and has served in his current role since 2014. Previous roles include auditor, credit analyst, corporate strategist, commercial loan officer, commercial sales leader, and market president. As Regional President of the Northern Region, Mr. Hopkins provides oversight to all functions of the branch network in the Northern Region consisting primarily of all West Virginia branches. Mr. Hopkins holds a Bachelor of Science Degree in Business with a concentration in Accounting and Finance obtained from Concord College (now University) in 1995. He has also completed the ABA Commercial Lending School and the Wachovia Commercial Lending School.

R. Ramsey Martin, Regional President of the Eastern Region of First Community Bank.

Mr. Martin has been employed by the Corporation’s banking subsidiary, or a predecessor bank, since 2008 and has served in his current role since 2014. He has served in the banking industry since 1973. Previous roles with First Community include commercial banker, manager of credit administration, and city executive. As Regional President of the Eastern Region, Mr. Martin provides oversight to all functions of the branch network in Eastern Virginia. Mr. Martin is also the executive responsible for oversight of the bank’s mortgage professionals. Mr. Martin holds a Bachelor of Arts Degree in Economics obtained from the University of Richmond in 1975 and attended Virginia Bankers School of Bank Management in 1986.

Jeffrey N. Noble, Senior Vice President and Chief Credit Officer of First Community Bank.

Mr. Noble has served the Corporation’s banking subsidiary in various roles for more than thirty-three (33) years and has held his current position since 2013. In this role, Mr. Noble is responsible for the supervision of personnel, policies, procedures, and documentation for the Corporation’s credit administration function, inclusive of Consumer Lending, Mortgage Lending, Small Business Lending, Commercial Lending, Appraisal Services, and Special Assets. Mr. Noble holds a Bachelor of Science Degree in Business Administration with a concentration in Accounting, obtained from Concord College (now University) in 1986. He is also a graduate of the West Virginia School of Banking, RMA Commercial Lending School, and RMA Lending to Small Business School.

IndepIndependenceendence of Directors

The Board of Directors annually reviewsreviews the relationships of each of its members with the Corporation to determine whether each director is independent. This determination is based on both subjective and objective criteria developed by the NASDAQ listing standards and the SEC rules. Factors considered include, but are not limited to: each Director’s employment history with the Corporation, if any; compensation by the Corporation to each Director and their family members, if any; and the report of the GNC Chairman, which, for 2017, indicated2019, indicates that no related party transactions with any Director were such that they could constitute a material relationship with the Corporation. After considering each Director’s individual circumstance, the Board determined that, with regard to the following current Directors, Directors that served in 2019, and nominees, there are no circumstances or relationships exist which would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment as a director: W. C. Blankenship, Jr.; C. William Davis; Samuel L. Elmore; Richard S. Johnson; I. Norris Kantor; and M. Adam Sarver. Accordingly, these Directors and nominees are considered independent. Directors Stafford, II and Mills are not independent solely because they are named executive officers of the Corporation.

The NASDAQ listing standards contain additional requirements for members of the ACER Committee, the CRC,Compensation and Retirement Committee (the “CRC”), and the GNC. All of the directors serving on these committees are independent under the additional requirements applicable to such committees.

The BoardBoard of Directors and Board Meetings

Board Leadership Structure. William P. Stafford, II currently serves as Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation and as Chairman of the Board of Directors. The role of the Chief Executive Officer is to set the strategic direction for the Corporation and manage its performance, while the Chairman of the Board is tasked with setting the agenda for Board meetings and presiding over meetings of the Board. The Board of Directors believes combining the roles of Chief Executive Officer and Chairman is in the best interests of the Corporation at this time, as doing so best positions the Corporation to carry out its strategic plan for core growth and enhanced performance; increases value for shareholders; provides for greater accountability and transparency; enhances oversight of operations; and provides for greater Board involvement. Director BlankenshipElmore is the Lead Independent Director and Vice Chairman of the Board. Director BlankenshipElmore serves as Chairman of meetings of the Independent Directors.

Standards of Conduct. All directors, named executive officers, and other employees of the Corporation must act ethically at all times and in accordance with the policies comprising the Corporation’s Standards of Conduct (the “Code”“Standards”), which isare available at the Corporation’s website (www.firstcommunitybank.com under “Investor Relations”). Certification of compliance with the CodeStandards is required on an annual basis. Only the Board of Directors may waive a provision of the CodeStandards for directors and named executive officers and will only do so for just cause in an instance where the underlying ethical objective will not be violated. No waivers were granted to any director or named executive officer during 2017.2019. Amendments to the CodeStandards will be published on the Corporation’s website, as required by SEC rules. If an actual or potential conflict of interest arises for a director, the director must promptly inform the Board.

Communicating Concerns to Directors. The ACER Committee and the non-management directors have established procedures to enable any employee who has a concern about accounting, internal accounting controls, or auditing matters related to the Corporation to communicate that concern directly to the Board through an e-mail or written notification directed to the Chairman of the ACER Committee. Such communications may be confidential or anonymous. During orientation, employees are informed how to submit such communications and a notice explaining the sameWhistleblower Policy is set forthprovided in the employee handbook, on the Corporation’s Intranet, and a notice regarding the same can be found posted on bulletin boards at each location of the Corporation and its subsidiaries. The status of any unresolved concern is reported to the non-management directors of the Board periodically by the Chairman of the ACER Committee.

StockholderShareholder Communications. StockholdersShareholders may communicate with all or any member of the Board of Directors by addressing correspondence to the Board of Directors or to the individual director. StockholdersShareholders may address such communication to Secretary, First Community Bancshares,Bankshares, Inc., P. O. Box 989, Bluefield, Virginia 24605-0989, and all communications so addressed will be forwarded to the Chairman of the Board of Directors or to the individual director to whom such correspondence is directed, without exception.

Board Meetings. In 2017,2019, the Board of Directors held nine (9)eleven (11) regular meetings and one (1)two (2) special meeting.meetings. No member attended fewer than seventy-five percent (75%) of the Board meetings or committee meetings on which the member sits. Each director is expected to devote sufficient time, energy and attention to ensure diligent performance of the director’s duties and to attend all regularly scheduled Board, committee, and stockholdershareholder meetings. It is the Board’s policy that the directors should attend the Annual Meeting absent exceptional circumstances. All current directors attended the 20172019 Annual Meeting.

Meetings of Non-management Directors. The non-management directors met without any management director or other employee present on at least two (2) occasions in 2017.2019.

First Community Bank Board. First Community Bank (the “Bank”) is a Virginia chartered commercial banking corporation and the Corporation’s primary subsidiary. The Corporation conducts its banking operations, which constitute the overwhelming majority of its activities, exclusively through First Community Bank. The Board of Directors is aided in the governance and operation of its banking subsidiary by the board of directors of First Community Bank (the “Bank Directors”). The Bank Directors currently consist of the directors of the Corporation and eight (8) additional individuals with experience, qualifications, attributes, and skills appropriate for governing a community bank. In addition, due to their involvement in the communities served by the Corporation, the Bank Directors are uniquely positioned to advise the Management Team regarding community banking matters. The GNC regularly reviews the composition of the Bank board of directors in light of the Bank’s evolving needs, its assessment of the Bank Directors’ performance, and the markets in which the Bank operates. In considering whether to recommend any candidate for election to the Bank board of directors, the GNC considers many of the same criteria as when considering candidates for the Board of Directors, including but not limited to, the candidate’s integrity, reputation, business acumen, age, education, involvement in the communities served by the Bank, relationships and familiarity with the Bank’s customers, potential conflicts of interest, constructive and collegial personal attributes, knowledge of banking regulatory matters, as well as the candidate’s general experience and expertise in the financial services industry and civic and community involvement. The GNC also strives to accomplish broad geographic representation from the communities and markets the Bank serves and seeks candidates who can help ensure the Bank Directors remain intimately involved in the banking affairs of the Bank’s customers and communities.

In addition to the Board committees mentioned above, the Bank maintains several standing committees, including Loan Committee (which oversees lending matters), Asset Liability Committee (ALCO) (which oversees management of the Bank’s balance sheet), Trust Committee (which oversees trust and investment matters), and Information Systems Steering Committee (ISSC) (which oversees information technology matters, including information technology, information security, and payment channels). Both Corporation directors and Bank directors serve on each Bank-level committee, providing oversight to that committee’s respective area of operation.

BoaBoardrd Committees

The Board of Directors has four (4) standing committees: the ACER Committee, the Executive Committee, the CRC, and the GNC. For each of these committees, except the Executive Committee, the Board of Directors has adopted a written charter, a current copy of which is available for review and/or printing on the Corporation’s website at www.firstcommunitybank.com under Investor Relations.Relations.   Each such charter is reviewed and approved annually by the relevant committee and by the Board.

Audit Compliance and Enterprise Risk Committee. On April 26, 2016, the Board of Directors unanimously voted to constitute and establish the ACER Committee by ratification of the ACER Committee Charter previously approved by the former Audit Committee. The ACER Committee combines the functions of the former Audit Committee with those of the banking subsidiary’s Compliance and Enterprise Risk Committees to provide Committee members a more holistic view of the financial, legal,, and regulatory risks affecting the Corporation and its banking subsidiary.

The current members of the ACER Committee are Director Blankenship,Davis, who chairs the Committee; Director Johnson;Elmore; Director Kantor;Johnson; and Director Sarver. All current members of the ACER Committee are independent. Director Johnson is the audit committee financial expert, as the SEC defines that term and as the Board interprets such qualification in its business judgment consistent with such definition. The ACER Committee is primarily concerned with the integrity of the Corporation’s financial statements, the independence and qualifications of the independent registered public accounting firm, and the performance of the Corporation’s internal audit function and independent registered public accounting firm. Its duties include but are not limited to: (1) selection and oversight of the independent registered public accounting firm; (2) review of the scope of the audit to be conducted by the independent registered public accounting firm, as well as the results of their audit; (3) oversight of the Corporation’s financial reporting activities, including the annual report and the accounting standards and principles followed; (4) discussion with the Senior Management Team and other relevant employees of risk assessment and management policies, including risk relating to the financial statements and financial reporting process and the steps taken by management to monitor and mitigate such risks; (5) approval of audit and non-audit services provided to the Corporation by the independent registered public accounting firm; (6) review of the organization and scope of the Corporation’s internal audit function and its disclosure and internal controls; and (7) oversight of regulatory compliance and enterprise risk management. The ACER Committee held eight (8) meetings during 2017.2019. The ACER Committee’s report is on page 35.

Executive Committee. The current members of the Executive Committee are Director Stafford II, who chairs the Committee; Director Blankenship; Director Davis; Director Elmore; Director Johnson; Director Kantor; Director Mills and Director Sarver. The Executive Committee did not meet in 2017.2019. The Committee, subject to the supervision and control of the Board of Directors, has been delegated substantially all of the powers of the Board to act between meetings of the Board, except for certain matters reserved to the Board by law.

Compensation and Retirement Committee. The current members of the CRC are Director Johnson, who chairs the Committee; Director Blankenship;Davis; and Director Kantor.Elmore. All three (3) members of the CRC are independent. The CRC’s primary duties and responsibilities are to: (1) review, evaluate, and determine annually compensation of the Chief Executive Officer and President; (2) review, evaluate, and approve annually compenstioncompensation of each other named executive officer; (3) review, evaluate, and approve annually compensation of the Senior Management Team; (4) review, evaluate, and approve all incentive and equity-based compensation; and (5)  review, evaluate, and approve the proxy statement Compensation Discussion and Analysis and the CRC report. While the CRC receives input from the Chief Executive Officer and President, who play a significant role in the compensation setting process, as well as other members of management, as needed, the ultimate decision regarding compensation of the named executive officers rests with the CRC. Further, the Chief Executive Officer and President do not participate in these matters as they relate to their respective compensation. For a full discussion of the CRC and management’s respective roles administering the executive compensation program, please see the Compensation Discussion and Analysis. The CRC does not delegate any of its responsibilities to subcommittees.subcommittees, except as it relates to the day to day administration of benefit plans. The CRC held four (4)five (5) meetings in 2017.2019. The CRC’s report is on page 19.21.

Compensation and Retirement Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation. None of the members of the CRC are or were formerly employed by the Corporation or any of its subsidiaries. Finally, none of the named executive officers of the Corporation served on any compensation committee or any board of directors of another company of which any of the Corporation’s Board members was also an executive officer.

Governance and Nominating Committee. The current members of the GNC are Director Blankenship,Elmore, who chairs the Committee; Director Elmore; Director Kantor;Davis; and Director Sarver. All four (4)three (3) members of the Committee are independent. The Committee’s responsibilities include the selection of director nominees for Board service and the development and review of governance guidelines. The Committee also: (1) oversees evaluations of the Board, as well as director performance and Board dynamics; (2) makes recommendations to the Board concerning the structure and membership of Board committees; and (3) reviews, approves, and ratifies significant transactions with related persons. This Committee held four (4)five (5) meetings in 2017.2019.

Anti-Hedging Policy

All of the Corporation’s directors, officers and employees are subject to the First Community Bankshares, Inc. Insider Trading Policy. The Insider Trading Policy provides that insiders (defined as directors, officers, employees, and independent contractors and those in a special relationship with the Corporation such as auditors, consultants or attorneys, who possess material, non-public information) and their related persons should not engage in any transactions that suggest they are speculating in the Corporation’s securities. The Insider Trading Policy prohibits insiders and their related persons from trading in options, warrants, puts and calls or similar instruments on Corporation securities or sell Corporation securities “short” or “sell against the box.”   The Insider Trading Policy also prohibits insiders and their related persons from holding Corporation securities in margin accounts. The Insider Trading Policy discourages insiders from engaging in hedging transactions, such as “cashless” collars, forward sales, equity swaps and other similar arrangements and requires that any such transaction be carefully reviewed by the Insider Trading Officer (the general counsel of the Corporation or their designee) prior to the insider entering into such transaction to determine whether such transaction would violate the Insider Trading Policy. The Insider Trading Policy contains an addendum with more restrictive requirements that applies to certain designated insiders, including executive officers, directors, certain other officers, employees and consultants of the Corporation, and such addendum prohibits the designated insiders from engaging in hedging or derivative transactions, such as “cashless” collars, forward contracts, equity swaps and other similar or related transactions.

PROPOSAL 2: NON-BINDING, ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Pursuant to Section 14A of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), the Corporation is requesting shareholder approval of the compensation of its named executive officers as disclosed in this proxy statement. This proposal, commonly known as a “say-on-pay” proposal, gives shareholders the opportunity to express their views regarding named executive officers’ compensation. The vote is not intended to address any specific items of compensation, but rather the overall compensation of named executive officers and the philosophy, policies, and practices described in this proxy statement. The Corporation believes that the compensation of named executive officers is straightforward, uncontroversial, and not designed to provide incentives for excessive risk taking. Accordingly, the following resolution is submitted for shareholder approval.

RESOLVED, that the Corporation’s compensation paid to the Corporation’s named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K, including the CD&A, executive officer compensation tables, and related narrative discussion, is hereby APPROVED.

The “say-on-pay” vote is an advisory vote, which is not binding on the Corporation. However, the Board and the CRC value the opinions expressed by shareholders through their vote on this proposal, and will carefully consider the outcome of the vote when making future compensation decisions with respect to the Corporation’s named executive officers. The Corporation is currently conducting the “say-on-pay” advisory vote every three (3) years. The timing of the next “say-on-pay” advisory vote is addressed in Proposal 3.

The board of directors unanimously recommends a vote FORthis proposal.

PROPOSAL 3: NON-BINDING, ADVISORY VOTE ON THE FREQUENCY OF

THE ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Section 14A of the Exchange Act also requires the Corporation to hold an advisory vote on the frequency of the advisory vote on executive compensation as described in Proposal 2 of this proxy statement. By voting on this Proposal 3, shareholders may indicate whether they would prefer that the Corporation hold a “say-on-pay” every one (1), two (2), or three (3) years. Shareholders may also abstain from voting. Accordingly, the following resolution is submitted for shareholder approval:

RESOLVED, that the Corporation hold a shareholder non-binding, advisory vote to approve the compensation paid to the Corporation’s named executive officers as disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K with a frequency of once every one (1) year, two (2) years, or three (3) years, whichever receives the highest number of votes cast with respect to this resolution.

The Corporation asks that you support a frequency of every three (3) years for future shareholder advisory votes on executive compensation. The Corporation believes that a three (3) year cycle provides the Board and the CRC with sufficient time to evaluate and respond to shareholder input and effectively implement changes, as needed, to executive compensation.

The frequency of one (1) year, two (2) years, or three (3) years that receives the highest number of votes cast will be deemed by the Corporation as the frequency for the advisory vote on executive compensation selected by shareholders. The Board will consider the outcome of the vote when making future decisions regarding the frequency of the “say-on-pay” vote. However, because this is advisory and not binding on the Board or the Corporation, the Board may decide that it is in the best interest of shareholders and the Corporation to hold an advisory vote on the compensation of named executive officers more or less frequently than the frequency approved by the shareholders. Shareholders will not be voting to approve or disapprove the Board’s recommendation.

The board of directors unanimously recommends a voteFOR aFrequency of every three (3) years for future shareholder advisory votes on executive compensation.

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

The following compensation discussion and analysis details the Corporation’s compensation program as it applies to the named executive officers, as listed in the Summary Compensation Table on page 20.22. Further, this discussion also seeks to provide an overview of the Corporation’s general compensation philosophy for its employees, most significantly the Senior Management Team and certain other employees who are granted equity or other incentive compensation. This discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the Summary Compensation Table, its accompanying footnotes, and the additional tables and narrative disclosures that follow.

ComCompensationpensation Philosophy and Objectives

The goal of the Corporation’sCorporation’s compensation program is to retain and reward named executive officers and key employees who create long-term value for stockholdersshareholders through consistent financial and operating performance coupled with strong leadership. This overriding objective affects all elements of the compensation program. In addition, the Corporation desires to become the employer of choice and to be viewed as a model of best practices for executive and other compensation. The overall objective of the executive compensation program is to align the long-term interests of each member of the Senior Management Team as closely as possible with those of stockholdersshareholders and motivating high performing executives to continue with the Corporation for long, productive careers.

AdminAdministrationistration of the Executive Compensation Program

The CRC meets as often as necessary to perform its duties and responsibilities. The CRC met four (4)five (5) times during calendar year 2017.2019. The CRC typically meets with the Chief Executive Officer and President of the Corporation and, when appropriate, the Chief Financial Officer, General Counsel, legal counsel, and/or outside compensation advisors selected and retained by the CRC. The CRC receives and reviews materials in advance of each meeting. These materials include information that management believes will be helpful to the CRC, as well as materials the CRC has specifically requested.

The CRC meets regularly in executive session, without the presence of any employee, including at least annually to evaluate the performance of the Chief Executive Officer and President, to set performance objectives for the Chief Executive Officer and President, and to set base compensation for the Chief Executive Officer and President. The CRC also annually reviews, evaluates, and approves the compensation of each other named executive officer; reviews, evaluates, and approves the compensation of the Senior Management Team; reviews, evaluates, and approves all incentive compensation; and reviews, evaluates, and approves any grants of long termlong-term retention and equity compensation.

ConsidConsiderationserations Used to Determine Compensation

Below is a summary of factors considered by the CRC in setting compensation for named executive officers. The CRC performed its evaluation of compensation in light of each named executive officer’s performance, the Corporation’s performance, the current economic environment, the Corporation’s long-standing practice of prudent executive compensation administration, and shareholder input.

Emphasis on Consistent and Sustained Performance. The Corporation’s compensation program provides pay opportunities for those demonstrating superior performance for sustained periods. Each of the named executive officers has served the Corporation for many years, and each has held diverse positions with growing levels of responsibility. Relative compensation reflects previous contributions and anticipated future contributions to the Corporation’s long-term success. In evaluating sustained performance, the Corporation also gives weight to the relative performance of each named executive officer in his or her particular industry segment or function. The CRC also uses its judgment in determining or approving compensation adjustments and incentive awards, if any. This long-term view has the effect of encouraging focus on long-term financial performance.

Importance of Corporation Results. The CRC places substantial weight on the Corporation’s overall financial success, including achievement of short and long-term strategic goals and annual financial results. The CRC is of the opinion that the named executives share the responsibility of supporting the Corporation’s overriding goals and objectives as part of the management team.

Judgment Versus Formula-Driven. The CRC does not use formulas in determining the level or mix of compensation.compensation for named executive officers. It evaluates a wide range of quantitative and qualitative factors, which include consistency in reaching targeted goals, the ability to perform in both good and challenging economic times, a history of integrity, evidence that the named executive officer uses good judgment, and his or her ability to lead and create future value for the Corporation.

Risk Considerations in the Compensation Program. The CRC views the Corporation’s compensation program with a long-term focus. Under the program, the greatest amount of compensation can be achieved over long periods of time through sustained superior performance. The Corporation believes this provides a strong incentive to manage the Corporation for the long term with a clear message to avoid excessive risk in the near term. The CRC maintains full discretion to adjust compensation based upon performance and adherence to the Corporation’s values.

In 2017,In 2019, the CRC continued its extensive review of the relationship between risk management and incentive compensation to ensure that incentive compensation does not encourage engaging in unnecessary or excessive risks that threaten the value of the Corporation. The CRC concluded that the Corporation’s compensation policies and practices do not encourage excessive or inappropriate risk and instead encourage behaviors that support sustainable long-term value creation. For instance, the CRC does not use highly leveraged, short-term incentives that drive high risk investments at the expense of long-term company value. Rather, the Corporation’s annual incentive compensation is based on balanced performance metrics that promote disciplined progress focused on longer-term goals.

Future Compensation Opportunity. The CRC intends to continue to provide a mix of different compensation elements. The CRC believes that each named executive officer should have a portion of his or her compensation be contingent upon how well the Corporation operates and how well its stock performs in the long run.

Use of Compensation Consultants. As part of the Corporation’s ongoing effort to ensure its compensation program complies with industry best practices and to ensure compliance with the enhanced level of regulation and scrutiny on executive compensation, the CRC exercises its authority to retain independent compensation consultants, as needed, to provide technical advice and information related to compensation for all employees of the Corporation. WhileIn late 2018, the CRC did not engage anyengaged compensation consultant in 2017, the executive compensation methodology continued in 2017 wasconsultants Matthews Young – Management Consulting (“Matthews Young”), who had previously developed with the assistance of Mathews, Young -- Management Consulting (“Mathews Young”).then-current compensation methodology. The CRC carefully considered their recommendations during 2019. No other compensation consultants were engaged in 2019.

CompComponentsonents of Executive Compensation

The principal components of the executive compensation program are:

The CRC attempts to balance the various elements of compensation among annual base compensation (current(current cash payments), annual incentive awards (when appropriate), and long-term retention and equity awards. In addition to these principal components, the compensation program also includes employment contracts which include change in control provisions, deferred compensation elections, retirement plans, a supplemental executive retirementretention plan, and other perquisites and benefits, each of which are discussed in this Compensation Discussion and Analysis with respect to the named executive officers.

Base Compensation. Compensation. Named executive officers receive base compensation in the form of a base salary. Levels of base salary are established annually under a programmethodology intended to maintain parity among the Senior Management Team based on levels of responsibility and the competitive market for executives in comparable positions. Base salary is a critical element of executive compensation because it provides executives with a base level of monthly income. In determining base salaries, the CRC considers qualifications and experience, scope of responsibilities, future potential, established goals and objectives, past performance, competitive salary practices at competitive companies, internal pay equity, and the tax deductibility of base salary.

Based on the above criteria,criteria, the Chief Executive Officer and President recommend base salaries for all named executive officers to the CRC for theirits consideration, except the Chief Executive Officer and President do not participate in their respective base compensation determinations. The CRC then considers and approves or declines base salary adjustments for all named executive officers. Based on the above criteria, the CRC also adjusts base salary for the Chief Executive Officer and President.

Prior to appointment to their present positions, Mr. Stafford, II had served as a Board member since 1994 and as Chairman ofBased on the Board since 2010, and Mr. Mills had served as an officer of the Corporation’s banking subsidiary since 1998, including serving as its Chief Credit Officer since 2007. When Mr. Stafford, II and Mr. Mills assumed their present positions in the third (3^rd) quarter of 2013, the CRC setabove described base compensation for each commensurate with the responsibilities of each position and their prior experience, but which also reflected their absence of prior experienceconsiderations, Mr. Belcher received a 9% increase in their new roles. With respect to Mr. Stafford, II, initial base compensation also reflected his agreement with the Board to spend the significant majority, but less than all, of his time in management of the Corporation, which allowed Mr. Stafford, II to continue to practice law on a much reduced scale as a member of the law firm Brewster, Morhous, Cameron, Caruth, Moore, Kersey & Stafford, PLLC. Based on consideration of the above factors, and the relatively short time since assuming their present positions, the CRC did not adjust base compensation for the Chief Executive Officer or President in 2014. During the 20152019 fiscal year, the CRC noted that Messrs. Stafford, II’s and Mills’ base salaries were below the lowest endyear. This increase was based on his assumption of the peer review data.  Accordingly,role of Chief Operating Officer. The CRC carefully considered the CRC adopted a plan tobase compensation of the other named executive officers and determined that their salary levels were consistent with the above described methodology and no increase their base salaries over a period of three (3) years, with each annual increase independently considered by the CRC at that time. Based on the aforesaid considerations, Mr. Stafford, II received an 11.11% increase in his base salarywas warranted for the 20172019 fiscal year and Mr. Mills received a 12.50% increase in his base salary for the 2017 fiscal year.  In a continued effort to more closely align their salaries with peers and provide for cost of living adjustments, Mr. Brown received an approximate 4% increase in his base salary; Mr. Lilly received an approximate 2% increase in his base salary; and Mr. Belcher received an approximate 5.41% increase in his base salary. Please see the Summary Compensation Table on page 2022 for more information about the 20172019 base salaries of named executive officers.

Discretionary Annual Incentive Compensation. For each named executive officer, the CRC may award incentive compensation based upon the previous year’s performance as evaluated by the CRC, Chief Executive Officer and President (except the Chief Executive Officer and President do not participate in their own respective incentive determinations). Please see the Summary Compensation Table on page 2022 for more information about annual incentive compensation awarded to named executive officers in 2017,2019, based on 20162018 performance.

In December 2015,2015, with the assistance of Matthews Young, the CRC adopted an executive and board incentive compensation methodology which provides for suggested amounts of annual incentive compensation to be paid to named executive officers and other members of the Senior Management Team in the form of cash bonuses (75%) and grants of Corporation stock (25%) which areis subject to a two (2) year restriction on their sale and clawback by the Corporation should a restatement of the financial statements be required. The methodology is partially based on certain evaluation criteria, including but not limited to Corporation performance compared to strategic objectives as measured by incentive compensation scorecards, Corporation performance compared to strategic objectives not measured by scorecards, and the overall financial and strategic performance of the Corporation. Scorecards are developed and/or reviewed on an annual basis by the CRC in conjunction with review by the Board of Directors of the Corporation’s strategic plan. Financial measurements within the scorecard are calculated using audited financial information obtained from the Corporation’s filed Form 10-K. The scorecard methodology defines suggested maximum incentive compensation payout as a percentage of each executive’s base compensation within a defined return on average equity (“ROAE”) range. Equity compensation, incentive compensation, or other forms of compensation for executives are excluded from the incentive compensation calculation. No incentive compensation is awarded if annual ROAE is 6.50% or less.less than 8.50%. The scorecard methodology encompasses key performance indicators (“KPI’s”), which align with the Corporation’s strategic plan objectives and annual financial budget. Each KPI is assigned a weighting. Some KPI’s vary over time (both as to identity and amount). The KPI’s under the current scorecard methodology include: Return on Average Assets (ROAA); Earnings Per Share (EPS); and Efficiency Ratio, among others, and include a discretionary component. A performance objective, or target, is established for each KPI. Recognizing the difficulty in precisely defining the appropriate target, and to further discourage imprudent or excessive risk taking, a range of acceptable performance is defined representing the minimum level of performance and maximum level of performance relative to target that results in an incentive compensation payout for that KPI. This methodology was employed to provide suggested compensation awarded in 2017,2019, based on 20162018 performance.

However, this methodology provides only a suggested incentive compensation amount based on general guidelines that the CRC may consider in its decision makingdecision-making process. Sole discretion as to the terms and conditions of any award, including whether or not to grant incentive compensation and in what amounts, remains with the Board, acting directly through the CRC. The CRC continues to oversee all aspects of the design, payment, and monitoring of executive incentive compensation. Further, the Corporation’s Board of Directors retains authority to review and approve or disapprove all CRC action. The ultimate goal of both the CRC and the Board in granting incentive compensation is to align the interests of recipients with that of shareholders and encourage long-term strategic thinking and performance while at the same time discouraging imprudent, unreasonable or excessive risk taking.

In 2016,2018, the Corporation’s budgetary, strategic and operational achievements were such that the CRC considered them sufficient to warrant payment in 20172019 of the recommended amount of discretionary annual incentive compensation to the named executive officers and certain other employees. The CRC, with input from management regarding budget and performance, chose to award incentive compensation to the named executive officers as set forth in the Summary Compensation Table on page 20.22. Such incentives to the named executive officers were paid in the form of cash (75%) and restricted stock (25%). The CRC believes that paying some portion of incentive compensation in the form of stock is a best practice that serves to facilitate its goal of aligning the interestsinterest of the named executives with those of shareholders by giving the named executives a long-term stake in the Corporation’s success.

Long-Term Retention and Equity Compensation. 

Ideology and Mechanism. As is evidenced by the Corporation’s Stock Ownership Policy discussed on page 19,21, the CRC believes that long-term retention and equity compensation should be an integral and ongoing component of the compensation program because it has the effect of further promoting the Corporation’s commitment to sound corporate governance, retaining and motivating the named executive officers, aligning their financial interests with the interests of stockholders,shareholders, specifically discouraging imprudent, unreasonable, or excessive risk taking, and rewarding them for achievement of the Corporation’s long-term strategic goals. Accordingly, the CRC has developed an equity compensation methodology that is consistent with this philosophy and is specifically designed to assist in achieving the aforesaid stock ownership objectives. Under this methodology, the CRC may grant either stock options or restricted stock awards to the named executive officers. Stock options provide the named executive officers with the opportunity to purchase and maintain an equity interest in the Corporation and to share in the appreciation of the value of the stock. When granting restricted stock, the CRC determines the applicable vesting schedule reflecting attainment of designated performance goals and/or other criteria specified in the award documents. The CRC may provide for the payment of any applicable dividends paid with respect to any shares of common stock subject to a restricted stock award during the period prior to lapse. As a mechanism for executingcarrying out these objectives, on February 28, 2012, the Board of Directors approved the First Community Bancshares,Bankshares, Inc. 2012 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan (the “2012 Plan”), which in turn was approved by the stockholdersshareholders at the 2012 Annual Meeting. The Board of Directors effectively replaced all prior equity plans with the 2012 Plan that conforms to current best governance practices.

While the decision whether to award equity compensation remains in the sole discretion of the CRC, subject to approval or disapproval by the Board of Directors, in 2015, the CRC adopted an equity compensation methodology to serve as a guideline and bring additional consistency and objectivity to the design and award of equity compensation. Under the methodology, any grant of stock to directors, named executive officers, or other members of the Senior Management Team is subject to a ratable three (3)-year vesting schedule and is further subject to a five (5)-year holding period subsequent to vesting. Most other grants of stock to other employees are in the form of incentive stock options with a three (3)-year cliff vesting schedule and expire ten (10) years after vesting. The CRC will not grant any equity compensation in any year in which the Corporation’s minimum three (3)-year rolling ROAE is below 7.00%8.5%, or such other minimum ROAE as determined by the CRC from time to time considering economic conditions, operating results, and adjustments to the Corporation’s strategic plan goals. The financial measurements utilized in the administration of the equity compensation methodology are calculated using audited financial information.

Current Long-Term Retention and Equity Compensation Grants. Consistent with the equity compensation methodology developed in 2015, on March 27, 2017,8, 2019, the CRC awarded long-term incentive equity compensation under the 2012 Plan to the named executive officers and other members of the Senior Management Team in the form of transfer-restricted shares. Such shares will vest over a three (3) year period beginning on or about March 27, 2018.8, 2020.

ConsidConsiderationserations Used in Setting Base Compensation for 20179 and Annual Incentive Compensation for 20168 Performance

Each year, and on a continuing basis, the Corporation develops short and long-term objectives necessary for it to be successful. These objectives for the most part mirror the Corporation’s strategic plan and annual financial budget planning sessions, during which the Corporation’s performance and growth opportunities are analyzed and goals and objectives are established for the upcoming year(s). These objectives include both objective financial metrics and quantitative and qualitative strategic and operational goals. The CRC uses these objectives to evaluate the performance of the Chief Executive Officer and President. However, each financial metric or quantitative goal used by the CRC in this process is only one of many considerations. Resulting evaluations and any resulting incentive or other compensation is not exclusively formula-driven. This process is designed to focus the Board, the CRC, and the entire Senior Management Team on factors that create long-term stockholdershareholder value. The CRC discusses with the Chief Executive Officer and President these factors as they relate to their respective compensation; provided, however, that the Chief Executive Officer and President do not participate in the final determination of their respective compensation.

In 2017,2019, the CRC worked closely with the Chief Executive Officer and President to monitor base and incentive compensation of other named executive officers. The CRC’s goal is to achieve a balance of base compensation and incentives that both contributes to retention of a highly qualified Senior Management Team and ensures that the Corporation remains competitive over the long term.

Each of the other named executive officers is a leader of an individualseveral business units or functionfunctions of the Corporation.Corporation’s banking subsidiary in their areas of expertise. As part of the Senior Management Team, they report directly to Mr. Mills in either his capacity as President of the President, whoCorporation or his capacity as the bank’s Chief Executive Officer and President. Mr. Mills then develops the objectives that each individual is expected to achieve, and against which their performance is assessed. These objectives are reviewed with the CRC and are also derived largely from the Corporation’s financial, budget and strategic planning processes. The President assesses eachEach named executive officer’s individual performance is assessed against the objectives, the Corporation’s overall performance, and the performance of the named executive officer’s business or function. The Chief Executive Officer and President then report base compensation levels, including any adjustments, as well as proposed annual incentive compensation for each named executive officer to the CRC. The CRC then approves proposed annual incentive compensation and/or long-term retention and incentive equity compensation, if any, for the named executive officers, other members of the Senior Management Team, and other employees. The named executive officers do not play a role in the determination of their compensation except for their discussion with the Chief Executive Officer, President, and/or CRC regarding their individual performance against predetermined objectives.

RetiremRetirementent Plans

The Corporation maintains certain retirement plans for some or all employees as follows:

KSOP Plan. The Corporation offers a qualified defined contribution Employee Stock Ownership and 401(k) plan known as the “KSOP” to most of its employees, including the named executive officers. The KSOP Plan is administered by the CRC.

WRAP Plan. In addition to the KSOP, the Corporation provides a non-qualified deferred compensation plan (discussed in more detail elsewhere in this proxy statement) referred to as the “WRAP” plan because the named executive officers, as well as certain other key employees, are unable to fully participate in the KSOP due to certain restrictions on their deferrals based upon annual testing limits imposed by the Internal Revenue Code. The WRAP plan allows highly compensated participants to defer a portion of their compensation that may not otherwise be deferred under the Corporation’s qualified plan. The WRAP plan is intended to promote retention of key employees by providing a long-term savings vehicle on a tax efficient basis.

SERP. The Corporation provides a defined retirement benefit to certain named executive officers and certain other key employees pursuant to a supplemental executive retention plan (the “SERP”). Each executive’s SERP is unfunded and designed to provide a benefit paid upon separation from service at or after age sixty-two (62). upon separation from service. The benefit is targeted at a maximum of thirty-five percent (35%) of final average compensation subject to an annual benefit limit of $80,000. Final average compensation is calculated as the average of the participant’s last three (3) full calendar years’ compensation, which compensation is determined by assuming a three percent (3%) compound annual rate of increase to the participant’s annualized base monthly salary as of the date that the participant enters the SERP. Vesting is on a graded schedule as follows: twenty-five percent (25%) vesting after five (5) years of service; fifty percent (50%) vesting after ten (10) years of service; seventy-five percent (75%) vesting after fifteen (15) years of service; an additional five percent (5%) vesting for each year of service beyond fifteen (15) years, and full vesting after twenty (20) years of service or upon reaching age sixty-two (62).

PerquPerquisitesisites and Other Benefits

In addition to the annual and long-term compensation described above, named executive officers receive other benefits and items of compensation. Such benefits and other items of compensation include, among others: group lifelife insurance, club dues, and automobile allowance. These benefits are provided to increase the availability of the named executive officers to focus on the business of the enterprise. The costs associated with providing these benefits and other items of compensation for our named executive officers are reflected in the Summary Compensation Table on page 20.22. A chart disclosing the value of these additional items is found on page 2123 entitled “All Other Compensation and Benefits.”

Named executiveexecutive officers participate in other employee benefit plans generally available to all employees on the same terms as similarly situated employees. These plans include medical, dental, group life insurance, and group disability programs, as well as flexible spending accounts for reimbursement of medical expenses. TheFor transparency purposes, the CRC has chosen to disclose all perquisites provided to our named executive officers in the Summary Compensation Table on page 2022 even if the perquisites fall below the disclosure thresholds under the SEC rules.

DefeDeferredrred Compensation Opportunities

Another aspect of the executive compensation program is the First Community Bancshares,Bankshares, Inc., Deferred Compensation Plan, referred to as the WRAP and a separate Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan. The WRAP and the Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan are voluntary, non-tax qualified, deferred compensation plans available to directors and certain employees, which employees include all of the named executive officers, to enable them to save for retirement by deferring a portion of their base and/or annual incentive compensation or director fees. The Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan does not require the Corporation to make matching contributions. The WRAP, which is intended to mirror the Corporation’s qualified KSOP, can include a discretionary match that coincides with a match made to the KSOP to the extent any employee, including the named executive officers, cannot otherwise receive a match in the KSOP. Balances for participating employees and directors are deemed invested in investment vehicles permitted from time to time by the Board of Directors in advance and credits (or debits) for investment experience may be made from time to time based on individual fund elections similar to what participants in the KSOP are permitted to make. The CRC believes that these deferred plans are competitive with that provided by other banksfinancial institutions with which we compete for executive and director talent. Please see the section entitled “Deferred Compensation Opportunities” included the related tables beginning on page 1820 for additional information about the Deferred Compensation Plan foras it relates to named executive officers.

EmpEmploymentloyment Contracts

The Corporation provides the named executive officers with written employment contracts. There is no golden parachute, tax gross-up, or other similar type provisions contained in these contracts. See the section entitled “Potential Payments Upon Termination,” including the related tables, beginning on page 27 for an estimate of the benefits that the named executive officers would be entitled to receive pursuant to their respective employment agreements under various employment termination scenarios.

Subsequent to reorganization of the executive management teamreorganization in 2013 and 2014, management and the CRC developed an improved, prototype executive employment agreement. Each of the Corporation’s named executive officers has executed the new prototype agreement. The new agreements result in greater uniformity among the named executive officers concerning the terms of their employment. The execution and provisions of said agreements waswere previously reported on a Form 8-K filed on April 16, 2015.

The prototype agreement has an initial term of three (3) years and automatically extends for an additional year each January 1^st unless the Corporation or the respective executive gives notice that the employment term will not be extended. Each agreement provides for continuation of base salary for thirty-six (36) months, in the event of a change of control coupled with terminated employment either without “Cause” by the Corporation or by the executives for “Good Reason” (as these terms are defined in the agreements). The Corporation may terminate the employment of any executive at any time for “Cause” without further obligation owed. If the Corporation terminates employment for any reason other than for “Cause” or the executive terminates his employment for “Good Reason”, the Corporation will generally be obligated to provide compensation and benefits specified in the agreement for the balance of the term of the agreement. Upon the termination of employment, the executive will be subject to non-competition and non-solicitation restrictions. If the executive dies while employed by the Corporation, the Corporation will pay his or her estate through the end of the month in which his death occurs. If their employment is terminated as a result of permanent disability as determined pursuant to the agreement, then the Corporation has the right to terminate employment before the end of the applicable term.

TaTaxx Deductibility of Compensation

Under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, publicly held corporations generally may not take a tax deduction for compensation in excess of $1 million paid to any named executive officer during any fiscal year. There was an exception to the $1 million limitation for performance-based compensation meeting certain requirements. However, as a result of changes made by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, starting with the 2018 fiscal year Section 162(m) prohibits deducting compensation, including performance-based compensation, in excess of $1 million paid to anyone who serves as the chief executive officer or chief financial officer, or who is among the three most highly compensated executive officers. The only exception to this rule is for compensation (including performance-based compensation) that is paid pursuant to a binding contract in effect on November 2, 2017, that would have otherwise been deductible under the prior Section 162(m) rules.

To maintain flexibility in compensating executive officers in a manner designed to promote varying corporate goals, the CRC has not adopted a policy requiring all compensation to be deductible. However, the CRC considers deductibility under Section 162(m) with respect to compensation arrangements for executive officers. In 2017,2019, none of the named executive officers received compensation that the Corporation could not deduct by reason of Section 162(m) either before ofor after the changes made by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017.

StocStockk Ownership Guidelines

The Board of Directors believes that it is in the best interests of stockholdersshareholders forthe named executive officers and directors to own a significant amount of Common Stock of the Corporation. To that end, the Corporation has adopted the First Community Bancshares,Bankshares, Inc. Stock Ownership Policy. The policy encourages ownership of the Corporation’s Common stock by the directors and officers in order to align the interests of the Corporation’s stockholdersshareholders with the Corporation’s key decision makers. Although minimum stock ownership guidelines are set forth in the policy for the Senior Management Team and directors, all officers and directors of the Corporation are encouraged to hold as many shares of the Corporation as practical given their individual situation.

CompCompensationensation and Retirement Committee Report

The CRC has reviewed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and discussed that analysis with management. Based on its review and discussions with management, the CRC recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in the Corporation’s 20172019 Annual Report on Form 10-K and the Corporation’s 20182020 proxy statement. The following independent directors, who comprise the CRC, provide this report:

Richard S. Johnson (Chairman)

W.C. Blankenship, Jr.Samuel L. Elmore

I. Norris KantorC. William Davis

20201179 Summary Compensation Table

20179 All Other Compensation and Benefits

The Corporation provides the named executive officers with other perquisites and personal benefits as shown in the “All Other Compensation” column of the “2017“2019 Summary Compensation Table.” The Corporation and the CRC believe these are reasonable and consistent with its overall compensation program and better enable the Corporation to attract and retain superior employees for key positions. The CRC periodically reviews the levels of perquisites and other personal benefits provided to the named executive officers. The Corporation provides additional detail of those benefits in the tables below.

GraGrantsnts of Plan-Based Awards

The following table sets forth information concerning individual grants of stock awarded in fiscal year 20172019 to the named executive officers.